Quicksync vs x264 obs
I'll try a few encodes using your suggestions and get a feel. encoder: NVENC, x264, Quick Sync, and AVC Encoder for AMD video cards. x264 > NVENC > QuickSync, when we're talking quality. We made a guide on the best streaming settings for OBS that will give or higher. Is there any reason i should hold off and wait until H265 becomes more mature/adopted? i've got about 50 encodes to run and this is extremely time-consuming. NVENC uses a dedicated encoder chip on the GPU and the new NVENC is fire, QuickSync is an Intel encoding tech that does the same on a dedicated encoder chip the CPU, x264 uses your CPU the way most people think of that increases utilization. the longest encode i've had so far is 5 hours and that was for a 3 1/2 hour movie. As a side note, hardware encoders enable users to record high.
QUICKSYNC VS X264 OBS FREE
All hardware encoders are available for use with a free XSplit license. I guess i'll stick with slow or very slow. As of now XSplit has support for all publicly and commonly available HW encoders counting Nvidia NVENC, Intel Quick Sync, AMD VCE and of course AVerMedia’s Liver Gamer HD (C985) and Game Broadcaster (C127). the only problem is i notice some posterization artifacts in the quick sync encodes. From what I understand it is more CPU intensive than x264 but the file. It's an open source project maintained by the VideoLAN. On the other hand, x264 is a video encoder, a particular implementation of H.264 which compresses video files.
QUICKSYNC VS X264 OBS SOFTWARE
are you using a target size, target bitrate or crf? i typically do crf 18 and i've been using the slow preset in the past, but the files are coming out to ~10gb as opposed to 6 or 7gb if i use quick sync. You mean x265 I have never personally tried software x265 in OBS but I have in FFMPEG. x264 is a free software library and application for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC compression format, and is released under the terms of the GNU GPL. The Ripbot presets are no doubt different from Handbrake's, but in the ballpark I should think. But at 6 and 8 Mbps Turing AVC/H.264 wins. The matt surface hides fingerprints very well, especially compared to the carbon fiber surfaces of the XPS 15 or the dark plastic of a traditional ThinkPad ), the Core i7-8700K delivered 100 of the frames in GTA V, using the ‘very fast’ preset in OBS It’s still lagging behind the big players when it comes to extension support, but given. During bandwidth starvation at 4Mbps, QSV HEVC/H.265 beats Turing NVENC AVC/H.264. At 4Mbps QSV H.264 is worse than x264 Medium and Slow, as well as Maxwell and Pascal NVENC.
![quicksync vs x264 obs quicksync vs x264 obs](https://unrealaussies.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Video-Compression.png)
![quicksync vs x264 obs quicksync vs x264 obs](https://i.imgur.com/qfmZNw4.png)
I built my current computer with that in mind.Īnyway, since you asked: slow preset, film tune. QSV in H.264 always beats Kepler NVENC and x264 Fast, Faster and VeryFast. Personally, I switched from BDRB to Ripbot so I could use slower presets (smaller output file size for crf encodes). I use Ripbot, not Handbrake, but can't you queue up several encodes to run overnight? It seems a pity you wouldn't use your very powerful CPU for best quality. So you're encoding to target file size rather than crf? Best quality would be the slowest preset you can tolerate.